10700k vs 3900x reddit
I'm in the same boat as you, but imho it's worth waiting to see what drops in a few months. So basically I should go with amd when I'm doing a lot of multithread operations, and when it's more for gaming and rendering I should go with Intel? Alt-tab & watch videos, browse etc. /r/buildapc is a community-driven subreddit dedicated to custom PC assembly. The 10700K will edge out any Ryzen chip right now, but at higher resolutions the differences are a wash without a 2080Ti to exaggerate the differences. Close. If you're looking for the best gaming experience in that price range I would look at GPU and Monitor first then build around that. Even if it performs otherworldly. Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities. Any workflow whatsoever? There’s not much difference between … 9900k vs 3900x gaming reddit. Zen 3 is probably going to tilt AMD further and the 7+ nm node is going to improve density by 20% and power consumption reduction of about 10%. I chose Intel again because the performance will be noticeable and even more so while streaming. We don't know the performance yet so there's little point in comparing the two other than the 8 cores vs 12 cores part. Press J to jump to the feed. Bottom line, seek the right product for what you are doing with the CPU. Get on tech sites (Anandtech, Tomshardware, etc), and try to find some benchmarks for the software that you'll use, and which one provides better performance overall, or better performance for the money. *I'm sure someone could probably nitpick and find a narrow exception, but the overwhelming majority of non-gaming stuff. GPUs are pushing FPS with modern AAA games. Choose for what you will be doing with the machine. Gotta pick the right tool for the job, duder. A guy who praises Intel for something that doesn't get downvoted to hell & back? Posted by 8 months ago. We’ll primarily be comparing the Ryzen 7 3800XT against Intel’s 10th Gen Core i7-10700K which is selling for … I use my PC primarily for gaming with the occasional streaming. Welcome to the official subreddit of the PC Master Race. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. 10700k vs 3700x reddit 04.11.2020. If money's not a problem and you want a little more fps go for 9900k or 10700k. /r/buildapc is a community-driven subreddit dedicated to custom PC assembly. I was about to get the 9900k, even bought a mobo, returned it and bought an X570 Aorus Master and 3900x. Matlab itself runs multithreaded operations but the problem is that most tasks are series of small operations where you can only multithread in each individual operation rather than multithread from start to finish like in tile based rendering. (10 Cores/20 Threads)Intel Core i7-10700K Stock. I am upgrading from an i7 7700k. This also applies to 3900X vs 10700K, … It's total BS. 3900x. This depends on what you want to do with the PC. Building a machine for work and play? Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. If OP can wait, he should consider building in the fall or winter when NextGen drops -- mainly because the PSU supply is sold out across North America, as well as other PC parts. It has a boost clock speed of 4.5 GHz, overtaking the … Just as an example, i work with matlab and some medical imaging related algorithms. Looking at upgrading my current PC and for what's in my price range the Ryzen is the one I wish to go with, but I also know the 10700k will be dropping shortly and I don't know if I should wait and see it's performance and price or not. What is this? Get the Ryzen. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Purely gaming? 10700k/kf will be better in super high refresh rate gaming ie >144hz. Oh jeez didn't even think of that, now I'm going to have to look into the timeline of the 4900x and see, I was so excited to get my tax check because that was going to determine when and now all of this, lol. Anthony Butler Linkedin, 2. I just evaluated how the implementations i've been using run on my home machine and turns out most of them run almost entirely single threaded. As per a notification shared on Twitter, Intel is already discontinuing its 10th Gen Comet Lake-S desktop lineup, with the product discontinuance program reportedly already in … Anyone is welcome to seek the input of our helpful community as they piece together their desktop. AMD’s 3900X at stock and 4.3GHz ends up the highest-performing Ryzen part, allowing the 10900K stock CPU a lead of about 5.4%. Until NVIDIA releases the new Ampere 3000 series, and AMD releases Big Navi (supposedly around September or October if rumours are true), the 2080 Ti is the most powerful consumer GPU. Intel Core i9-10900K, Core i7-10700K, Core i5-10600K vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 5 3600X OC Tests; 15. Want to stream? The margins remain much the same at 1440p, with the 10700K … 10700k is basically gonna be the same as a 9900k. In general the 3900X seems to be faster in the majority of non-gaming tasks but that's not universally true. This is the place to ask! Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8... Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K) $344.99 10700k vs 3900x. … 10700K 15.2% higher fps vs 3900X : View attachment 182187 10700K 15.6% higher fps vs 3900X : View attachment 182188 Notice that lowly 10400 besting the 3900X … It's the $300 3700x VS … 3900x is really for professionals or streamers. 1440p gaming won't see a noticeable difference between almost any chip you'd consider. Then you’ll be comparing apples to apples in terms of soon to be released. 3. And mostly they seem to be memory limited as they have to run huge amount of data through the algorithms. Also don't listen to "gaming intel, anything else AMD" simplification. Which one is a better in your opinion for a 1500-1800 dollar pc. The Ryzen 9 3900x is about 30% more expensive than the Intel Core i7 10700K, possibly pushing it out of the comfortable price range of many people. Looking at the Core i7 10700K, however, it is a solid 15% faster on average for exporting while the Ryzen 7 3800X only pulls ahead by about 3% for live playback. Very glad I did; I feel like I dodged a bad build decision. A fair and objective summary without "fanboyism" well done. For the gamer sitting in his or her chair in front of their computer, these FPS results are so marginal that they are not noticeable to the eye, and they have absolutely no effect on the game play experience. I would pick a 10700K as it comes with some hardware security mitigation and higher stock clocks. The closest thing to a 3700X on the newer ones is a faster 3800XT. I play mostly poorly optimized games, like Squad, Arma, Tarkov, and DayZ. Gaming Benchmarks: Ryzen 7 3800XT vs Core i7-10700K. I don't think any kinda gaming + general background apps workload is gonna need more than 16 threads in the next 4 years so that kinda takes 10900k and 3900x out of the picture. The 10700K is clearly faster for gaming and if I were building a gaming PC with this budget at the moment I would be looking at the 10600K or 10700K. I bought into the clock speed marketing too until I realized that Intel was just recycling the same chips with slight improvements, purposefully not innovating because they owned the market. What it means is that they technically have the highest FPS results in most games (the 3900x has surprisingly beaten the 10900k in several game benchmarks even overclocked). What gamers will experience is GPU bottlenecks before they ever experience a CPU bottleneck. (8 Cores/16 Threads)Intel Core i5-10600K Stock. Anyone is welcome to seek the input of our helpful community as they piece together their desktop. 3900x. The Ryzen 7 3800X is an 8-core, 16-thread high end desktop Zen 2 processor, built on AMD’s seminal 7nm manufacturing process. However, if you have the money to spend on a quality CPU that is able to handle innumerable processes, then the Ryzen 9 3900x … One option I would consider is if you want to build now to get a z490 board and a lesser cpu like i5. At the end of the day, in my opinion the 3900k is the better chip which is why I bought it. Looking to save money? 10900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs … Intel Core i9-10900K, Core i7-10700K, Core i5 … I'm seeing new things everyday. The "pure gaming" claim is Intel marketing spin. "Pure gaming" is Intel marketing propaganda. The only way a 3900X could beat a 10900K in gaming is if you run something in the background with very heavy CPU load while playing. Press J to jump to the feed. Want to stream? If you're planning on doing some sort of non-gaming task, you should look up benchmarks for whatever task you're planning on doing and see how the CPUs compare. This! 10th gen doesn’t support pcie 4 but 11 will on the same z490 board. 10700k vs 3900x. There are a lot of tasks in e.g. That’s the option to future proof the most while trying to build now. See how your specific workloads prefer Zen or Skylake cores. 10600k for gaming but 10900k for 240hz gaming. The reviewers generally test gaming and almost perfectly scalable multithreaded tasks such as rendering. Photoshop and the Adobe suite has an Intel preference while most rendering workloads will happily gobble up the extra Ryzen cores for a performance boost. I guess the 10700K will be better for gaming thanks to the frequency advantage (although it will need a hefty cooling solution I suppose, it's basically a tuned up 9900K) while the 3900X will be better for anything else. while gaming? However I’m not sure when pcie 4 will even be useful, likely only on 1k+ gpus in the next 5-10 years. Planning on building a computer but need some advice? Leaked 10700 (non K) performance numbers place it at the same performance level as 3700X, so 3900X will be faster, especially at multi-threaded loads. TL;DR -- "Purely gaming" is a BS marketing term invented by Intel to hide the fact that they have been recycling the same CPU "generation" after "generation" with minor adjustments, and AMD has finally caught them and provided a superior product at the price point. Based on the older benches the 9900k is very close to the 3900X in Photoshop, so the 10700k … Looking at upgrading my current PC and for what's in my price range the Ryzen is the one I wish to go with, but I also know the 10700k … Both are 8c/16t, and the 10700k is clocked a wee bit higher. I know, that Intel is the best when it comes to single core performance, but the ryzen chip makes up to that by having 6 cores more... which one is better? Consider chips like the 3700X or 10600K for mostly equivalent gaming performance to their more expensive options you're considering, especially if you're considering a 1440p or 4K monitor. Intel Core i9-10900K Stock. I think the 3900x and mid range mobos for it are cheaper, but I haven't shopped it recently. Now exactly what does this mean? Ive been looking to upgrade for a bit and see that 10th gen is on the horizon. Those perfectly scalable multithread workloads are not very common. Given that the 10700k is slightly ahead of the 3800XT, it shouldn't have any trouble beating the 3700X. One thing we … I know the Ryzen would be nice for editing 4k GoPro footage. 10900k only really makes sense if you play CPU bottlenecked games like squad or star citizen. Again, the 10700K was faster than the 3900X, but this time we’re talking about just a 5% performance advantage at 1080p. "Pure gaming" is Intel marketing propaganda. The 10700K’s $400 USD price tag puts it in a similar price band to AMD’s 12-core hyperthreaded Ryzen 9 3900X, however, the 10700K’s faster cores combined with its lower memory latency, … The 10700K’s $400 USD price tag puts it in a similar price band to AMD’s 12-core hyperthreaded Ryzen 9 3900X, however, the 10700K’s faster cores combined with its lower memory latency, yield a 12% effective speed advantage over the 3900X. Well the proper comparison would be to compare intel to the yet released 4900x. Sure you might get a few FPS where you can't tell the difference. Any advice is greatly appreciated, thank you. Archived. For anything* other than pure gaming the 3900x is better. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in … It means that, in most games, a 10900k will either tie with a 3900x or have a slight lead over AMD in FPS results. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. The 10700k is a rebranded 9900k. Ryzen CPUs above the R5 3600 don't really make sense for gaming builds IMO. 3700x can do 144hz pretty reliably in almost any game provided your gpu can do it as well, so there will be a handful of games (mostly poorly optimized single core heavy titles like Escape From Tarkov or flight sim 2020) that benefit noticeably from the higher clock speeds of the 10700k… Your 12C / 24T 3900X with dual 240mm AIO coolers gets whipped in Time Spy CPU by a 8C / 16T 10700K with a 4.9Ghz all core turbo and DDR4-4400 (which you probably … Thank you. Given a set budget of 1800 euros, for a pure gaming build I think it makes more sense to downgrade anyways and put the extra money towards the GPU. Any workflow whatsoever? Seriously, though, I commend you for having the courage to say something, which as someone who admittedly has a loyalty for Intel (they have served us well for the past years), feels great. We're not you, so we can't really tell you which is the better option. engineering that cannot be multithreaded well. Thank you, and yeah I know it's hard (impossible) to give a true comparison of the two but I know also sometimes we have a good insight into what the next is going to be capable of and I haven't been following it. Alt-tab & watch videos, browse etc. Get the Ryzen. The 10700k is a rebranded 9900k. i'm buildind a pc at around 1800 euros, and i want to know which CPU to buy. Yeah, I'm definitely not investing more that 600 Euros into a GPU. I would recommend a 3700x and spending more on the GPU for most people. We compared two 8-core desktop CPUs: the 3.8 GHz Intel Core i7 10700K against the 3.9 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 3800X. Planning on building a computer but need some advice? The key difference, of course, is the price. I literally just saw information the other day on the 10700k dropping around April and though shoot. The XT series of Ryzen CPUs barely outperform their cheaper X and non-X counterparts: 3600, 3600X, 3800X, 3900X.Outside of encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, … The limitations of current GPUs is where the bottleneck lies. As far as your TDP concerns I would recommend ignoring the intel tdp ratings all together. I was about to get the 9900k, even bought a mobo, returned it and bought an X570 Aorus Master and 3900x. If you're gonna take advantage of those cores, then get 3900x, Thank you, when comparing those 2 I wish to go with the 3900x so I guess that answers my question, If you want to use a 480mm rad to cool the 10700k sure, Didn't realize the heat was going to be that bad on it thank you. 3900x… The 10700K doesn't have a direct Ryzen 3000 competitor on the pricing front yet, with the ~$415 Ryzen 9 3900X serving as a step up with 12 cores and 24 threads, while the … 3900x. Then when next gen intel comes out upgrade to a i7 or i9. This is the place to ask! Another route is that you could also prepare for the Nvidia 3000 series and the Intel Rocket Lake or AMD 4000 series that's just around the corner. So just do 9900k vs 3900x. Practically speaking, this has zero effect on the end user of the product -- the gamer. while gaming? We do know the performance of the 10700 will be just like any generation change for the current intel 14nm node.
Road To The North Pole Pt 1, How To Watch The Comey Rule In Canada, Cheap Cigarettes Europe, Duck House For Sale, Q Mini Fix Price, Monika Schleier Smith Education, What Is Nectar Of The Gods,